How to Use Adjectives in English

An adjective describes how something is. For this reason, we often use the verb to be when using adjectives. Adjectives are used to describe nouns. There are two types of sentences we use with adjectives, which are detailed below. Subject To Be Adjective Example: Tom is shy.Alice is happy. Subject Verb Adjective Noun Example: That is a big building!Peter has a fast car. The adjective is always invariable. Example: beautiful trees, they are happy Take note of these important rules to follow when using this sentence pattern. Adjectives dont have a singular and plural form OR a masculine, feminine and neutral form.Adjectives are always the same! Never add a final –s to an adjective.Adjectives can also be placed at the end of a sentence if they describe the subject of a sentence. ​​Example: My doctor is excellent,  as opposed to  difficults  books, which is incorrect Adjectives Are Placed Before Noun Example: a wonderful book; very interesting people Note: Dont place an adjective after the noun Example: an apple red

Preservation And Restoration Of Persepolis - 2056 Words

Ancient Ruins of Persepolis Application report for the United Nations Committee for the Conservation Preservation and Restoration of Ancient monuments and Sites (UNCCPRAMS) grant to assist the conservation, preservation and restoration of Persepolis. Written by Ruby McCann, member of the ‘Conservation, Preservation and Restoration of Persepolis society.’ As the a member of the ‘conservation, reservation and restoration of Persepolis society’ (CRRPS) I would like to apply for your grant so I can begin to restore and fix damaged parts of the Persepolis complex. The Persepolis ruins are a heritage listed site with a very important historical background. The money will also go towards further archaeological research in order to uncover more about the ancient Persian empire. I fear that the more run down the site gets the less significant it will become and its character will be lost, and the ancient Persian empire will be forgotten. This money will be beneficial in maintaining the site. Background Persepolis, built in 550 BC by Achaemenid King Darius ‘the great’, was known in its day as the richest city under the sun. The capital of the largest empire the world had ever seen, it was built on an immense half-artificial, half-natural terrace, where the King created an impressive palace complex. The importance and quality of the monumental ruins make it a unique archaeological site. A popular tourist attraction, and a significant part of the ruins is the westShow MoreRelatedRosalind Krauss - Photographys Discursive Spaces9350 Words   |  38 Pagesorg/journals/caa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a

Mother to Son Free Essays

Langston Hughes’s poem entitled â€Å"mother to Son† is a poem of nurturing, love, and discussion of thoughts. The mother as the narrator of the poem shares her thoughts about life. She said that life is not an easy journey. We will write a custom essay sample on Mother to Son or any similar topic only for you Order Now   She relates her life to a stair, which was not a crystal or a beautiful and genuine gem. As what she is trying to tell her son, life is a never-ending journey with full of mysteries, fear, struggle, pain, success, and meaning. The mother saw her child giving up on something so she told him not to think about the negativities for it was the challenge of living. From the beginning of the poem, the narrator already took place as the authority and judge. As she stated her case, she already concluded many things around her journey and life. However, every insight that was imposed as personal justifications by using the words â€Å"for me†. It means that the conclusion is an opinionated discussion. Everything is logical but deep. The narrator reaches her hand towards her son as she wanted him to become a better person like the way she treated her life during her childhood until she became an adult. Her transition from being a soft-spoken mother to an imposer and going back to a nurturing and loving mother is a also a significant idea within the poem as she used the word â€Å"son† in the beginning, â€Å"boy† in the middle and â€Å"honey† in the latter part of the poem. The word â€Å"son† showed her literal relationship with her child. As she used the word â€Å"boy† it shows that the narrator became an imposer, but as she went used the word â€Å"honey† she imposed a more intimate relationship with her child – her love, nurturance and acceptance of her son’s weakness. Through this, the relationship of mother and child became an educator and student relationship but soon goes to a more intimate relationship that moulds the mother and the son to be intact. In terms of the symbolisms, elements, and images within the poem, the author used the images that can be seen within the house such as carpet, stair, and floor. It shows the true essence of motherhood because literally or logically speaking, mothers are made to nurture the home and the family. By looking or analyzing the images alone, it can be seen that narrator is a woman or a mother to be specific because it embossed the responsibilities of a woman within the house. There are also ironies within the poem such as dark and light, climbin’ and landin’, and fall and climb. The author showed a balance justification of strength and weakness towards the mother’s personality showing that she was not a perfect person, but trying to become a better one for her child. The author succeeds his attempt to incorporate both negative and positive aspects of life, which is a sensitive issue especially if a child is part of the situation. His attack was simple but complete. He stated everything a mother and child should know within a short poem that distinguishes him to become an effective moralist poet. The passage â€Å"Life for me ain’t been no crystal stair† was the main thesis of the poem. At the end of the narrator’s discussion, she showed in what she is trying to say about life by restating the main argument of the poem. This attack shows her responsibility to give her child a goof faith or belief how life is going to be as he went to his own journey. She pushed her son to climb the stair without thinking of the negative aspects of life but always on the positive side of everything because negativities are part of life but it was not the only reason for living. Work Cited Hughes, Langston. Mother to Son. (n.d.) 5 December 2007. http://www.tnellen.com/cybereng/matoson.html How to cite Mother to Son, Essay examples

Christian Ethics for Explorations in Theology -myassignmenthelp

Question: Should Christians become vegetarians? Answer: Introduction On my view, I think the Christian should become vegetarians. Over the years there has been controversy on regardless of whether Christians have the obligation of following the vegetarian, or at best meat-free diet that has progressed on for the decades (Amato Partridge, 2013). Most of the religions possess some type of the dietary laws; for instance the Old Testament, has detailed the food specifications that are still accompanied by various religions. Moreover, while looking for the scriptures for the alternatives, interpretations of precisely what the Bible highlights with regards to whether the mankind should devour other animals or at least differ much widely. Depending on David Grumett, a lecturer in the Christian Ethics at the University of the Edinburgh, he has proven there is certainly simply no solitary perspective in the Christian theology regarding consuming of the animals (Amato Partridge, 2013). Nevertheless, in the event that the meat is eaten, Dr David implies there ought to be moral approach. The animals must be elevated well. They should be recognized in precisely how they may be treated since they are gifts from God that were meant as companion. Additionally, if they are killed, this must be handled total minimum pain and the feasible suffering (Mackay, 2011). In this essay it will look at whether Christian should become vegetarians, considering they are re-evaluated on the moral status of the animal since they are concerned with the animal suffering. Individuals who become vegetarians often speak of the conversion to vegetarianism, because of this ethical component when it comes to their dietary practices. They have come to realize that the animals have the feelings and we should not kill them unnecessarily. Communicating to this ethical concern to the outside world, is much more difficult (Mackay, 2011). The Christian vegetarians more often find themselves in the odd position of sharing of the central part of their lives with the Jewish or the secular vegetarian which they do not share with their own religious community. Biblical narrative on killing animals In the narrative of the Bible God bestowed Noah together with his descendants restricted consent when it comes to consuming meat, however this is certainly particularly takes place after the sins comes into the order of the creation (Conradie, 2016). For great the history of the Christian history the new heavens along with the new earth that has already been pointed out in the New Testament it is decided to incorporate then nonhuman animals. Based on the Pope Francis he had pointed out that each in the off the cuff remarks and binding papal records that the afterlife might be knowledgeable by our fellow creatures (Largen, 2009). This explains that the animals are cherished animals by God and themselves will certainly predict the external life as the human experiences. The ramifications of the theological incontrovertible fact that the nonhuman animals fall under God instead of to the humans, has been obviously to the early Christians compared to it is to us presently (Largen, 2009). You will find different variation of the Christians that are commencing to recuperate to an infinitely more conservative view for the animals; one that honors the Bible along with the traditional Christianity over the present practices of sacrificing billions of the animals which are regarded idol of consumerism. Reason why Christians should give up animal cruelty and become vegetarians. One of the reason is that Gods original menu for the humans was vegan. This has been clearly examined in Bible in the book of Genesis 1 :29-30 ; it emphasizes that , Then God stated , I have provided you every single seed-bearing plant that are on the surface of the entire world and every tree that has fruit with seed within it (Linzey, 2009) . These will likely be your food. Also to all the beasts of the earth together with the birds that are in the sky in addition to the creatures which move along the ground-everything which breathe of life in it- I give every green plant for the food. This shows that God wanted man to eat the green plant for food he did not specify that the animals be eaten. From my understanding and interpretation is that God clearly highlighted that the man should eat the green plant for food and did not highlight that the animals he had provided be food. Another reason is that eating meat could cause climate change. The Christians are called to be the caretakers of the creations, yet the meat, eggs as well as dairy food waste much of the valuable resources and they contribute to the deadly change in the climate (Linzey, 2009). One of the single most effective things which the Christians could do would be to steward the creations of God and go vegan. Another reason is the animals do not want to die for our supper. Jesus understood how animals could much rather take care of their families than end up on our end plates. According to the Bible in the Scripture of Mathew 23: 37 highlights that, How often have I longed to gather on your children together, as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings. There has been questions has to whether it is ethical for the humans to consume the animals. It appears that the religious leaders all throughout the ages have been able to grapple with the contradictions which are inherent in the following as well as advocating peaceful existence of the human while at the same time they are killing and eating the animals (Tester, 2014). When it comes to the Christians there has been dilemma which is central which has been addressed in the very first chapter in the Bible Genesis, which has preceded even on the 10 Commandments which states that the initial thing which God did was creating the humans so they were termed to steward the earth along with the creatures (Gruen, 2011). The second thing which he announced was to see have I have offered you even the plant which produce seed that are on face of the earth, and every tree that has fruit ; you shall have them for food . This demonstrates an obvious call for the Vegetarianism from the basis of pre cisely what God has pointed out. Eating animals, today has certainly not been taken lightly. The Christian theologians are rediscovering the links that is between out dietary and spiritual choices (Linzey, 2009). Many people are arguing that vegetarianism is the diet that is most compatible with the Christian values for example mercy and compassion. Based on the Anglican priest and the Oxford professor Andrew Linzey who holds a PHD; they have argued that the Bible shows that to stand with the Jesus would be to, respect existence for the sake of the lord of life was to stand with the active empathy for the fragile, against the principle which can be right. Dependent on Linzey view this indicates the Christians should be vegetarian (Linzey, 2009). The contemporary Christian vegetarianism has been rooted to the ethical issues in relation to the abuse of the creation. Historically the Christians who select not to eat the flesh also observed their diet to be the approach to the larger s pirituality along with increased sanctity. Churches views Based on the Anglican Church look at the resolution from the 1998 Lambeth conference of the Anglican Church quite a lot standard to the contemporary considering the Christian with regards to the animals (Gruen, 2011). In the conference they conducted pointed out that the reaffirmation of the biblical vision of creation would be the fact it is a web inter-dependent relationships which is bound together to the covenant which the Holy Trinity has established the entire earth and precisely what is residing in it (Zur Klckner, 2014). Nonetheless, based on the catholic view it knows about that the animals have an instinctive value and they also have a place in the kingdom of God. Based on the Catholic Ethics of life, it highlights that the Christians ought to prevent anything which generate all the unnecessary struggling or maybe death to the animals (Mackay, 2011). Based on the Bible it highlights that in Gods plan man along with the woman have the vocation of subduing worldwide as the s tewards of God (Tester, 2014). This therefore, means that they were given the power to rule over everything on the earth and be the protectors of the creation of God (Lusk Norwood, 2016). Furthermore, killing of the creations of God do not conform to the aspect that they are protecting them irrespective they are eating them for food purposes. The Christian have the moral duty to consume the foods which may be significantly less due to the unnecessary suffering, unjust treatment, or even the human-induced premature death of the sentient beings that are a lot more focused on preventing the suffering as well as the preserving on their lives that God highlighted are much valuable and good (Mackay, 2011). Nonetheless, despite this Biblical interpretations on this issue there are some Christian who eat meat. Vegetarianism has been a Christian practice which has been based on the impacting compassionate teachings of Jesus Christ as well as the early church to all the sentient. Currently, this practice is not the current when it comes to the western Christian belief in addition to their culture. This notion and practice has just is scriptural and is supported historically. Some Christian have been eating meat since their interpretation in regards to the Bible is that it teaches them that human beings possess the dominion over the beasts and killing them for intent behind food or even any service to the human is a lot permitted (Mackay, 2011). Nevertheless, putting this aside general contentment of this ethos of dominance within the Christianity, the fact simply continue to be that when all the scriptural passages which are relevant to the animal welfare needs to be viewed within the bigger context of the Christian message on the facet of grace, atonement along with mercy that has already been exhibited all through the Bible (Mackay, 2011). There exists a considerably argument that has promoted the humane along with the compassionate treatment of the animals. In the Biblical point of view there have been strong case for the complete abstinence from the meat in addition to all the products that has been taught through the years (Leroy Praet, 2015). Man y of the celebrated Christian leaders, theologians along with the teacher were all vegetarians who espoused the view that the consumption of the meat is significantly as opposed to the Biblical message of love in addition to compassion (Tester, 2014). Biblical hermeneutics helps to resolve issue why Christian should be vegetarians Many of the Christians usually become vegetarians since it has to do with what they believe about God. There usually find that there are assertions when it comes to the scriptures which God has emphasized with the animals (Tester, 2014). Jesus clearly highlighted that not a sparrow falls to the ground without the Heavenly Father being emotionally involved. Additionally, many of the Christians shy away from eating meat because the Bible teaches us that we should treat our bodies just as the temples of God (Leroy Praet, 2015). Thus, individual need to do nothing which will hurt their bodies. Eating of the meat such as the red meat just as dietician would highlight is not good for the human bodies (Tester, 2014). The scripture commands individuals to maintain a healthy bodies and vegetarianism is a much healthier way of life. Moreover, in the peaceful kingdom which the Christ will establish during his second coming, vegetarianism will again be established order to the all the animals, which will also include the humans. Conclusion Becoming a vegan is a personal decision to the Christian, and thus there should be no condemnation of the ones who eat meat. Nonetheless, according to my view Christian who still eat meat need to re-evaluate the moral status of the animals, these are the creatures which were created by God and the humans were given the Stewardship to dominant them and protect them. The scripture of the Bible starting from Genesis that God gave humans all the seed yielding crops for food and did not categorize that the animals be eaten. I do think that the Christians who eat meat need to consider the reasons which I have provided in the essay as to why they need to become vegetarians. References Amato, P. R., Partridge, S. A. (2013). The new vegetarians: Promoting health and protecting life. Springer. Conradie, E. M. (2016). What do we do when we eat? Part II-a theological inquiry. Scriptura, 115, 1-21. Gruen, L. (2011). Ethics and animals: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. Kessler, C. S., Holler, S., Joy, S., Dhruva, A., Michalsen, A., Dobos, G., Cramer, H. (2016). Personality profiles, values and empathy: differences between lacto-ovo-vegetarians and vegans. Complementary Medicine Research, 23(2), 95-102. Largen, K. J. (2009). A Christian rationale for vegetarianism. Dialog, 48(2), 147-157. Leroy, F., Praet, I. (2015). Meat traditions. The co-evolution of humans and meat. Appetite, 90, 200-211. Linzey, A. (2009). Creatures of the same God: Explorations in animal theology. Lantern Books. Lusk, J. L., Norwood, F. B. (2016). Some vegetarians spend less money on food, others don't. Ecological Economics, 130, 232-242. Mackay, H. (2011). Right and wrong: How to decide for yourself. ReadHowYouWant. com. Tester, K. (2014). Animals and Society (RLE Social Theory): The Humanity of Animal Rights. Routledge. Zur, I., A. Klckner, C. (2014). Individual motivations for limiting meat consumption. British Food Journal, 116(4), 629-642.